Britain has its fifth prime minister in four years, and for the third time in that run the job changed hands without a general election. The constitution says that's fine. The constitution is answering a question nobody asked.
Crossbencher · 27 July 2026
Britain is on its fifth prime minister in four years, and for the third time in that run the office has changed hands without a general election. Every constitutional textbook says this is in order. The textbooks are right about the law and wrong about the country.
The rule itself is old and it isn't a loophole. Britain elects a Parliament, not a president. The prime minister holds office because the Commons sustains them, and a governing party that loses faith in its leader is entitled to change them without dragging the nation to the polls. There are real advantages in that design. It lets a government correct a failure quickly, and it spares the country a constitutional crisis every time a leader loses the room.
Members only
Every writer, every column
The last 30 days of the argument are free for everyone, always. The archive beyond that is a Member thing - it is part of what keeps the whole record free.
One email a day: today’s quiz, the Bench question, the argument and what broke - every figure with its source. Free, and it saves your streak. Stop it any time from one link at the bottom of it.