Reviews are announced, lessons are learned, inquiries report - and no one is ever answerable. That isn't complexity's accident. It's the architecture, and it's working as designed.
Crossbencher · 26 July 2026
When something goes wrong in Britain now, a familiar calm settles over the wreckage. A review is announced. Lessons will be learned. An inquiry is established, hears evidence for years, and publishes a report which says, in careful language, that the failure was systemic. And there the matter rests. The system did it, and you can't sack a system.
This is usually told as a story about complexity, as if responsibility simply evaporated somewhere in the wiring of the modern state. It didn't evaporate. It was piped away. Over four decades Britain has built an architecture of government whose most reliable output, whatever else it produces, is that failure lands on no one. The architecture is now so good at this that it should be understood as a design, not an accident.
Members only
Every writer, every column
The last 30 days of the argument are free for everyone, always. The archive beyond that is a Member thing - it is part of what keeps the whole record free.
One email a day: today’s quiz, the Bench question, the argument and what broke - every figure with its source. Free, and it saves your streak. Stop it any time from one link at the bottom of it.